I am a bit of a football fan and spend a fair amount of time in front of the TV watching my team, and any other team if the truth be known. Now what do you think is the worst thing about football? As a supporter of a club what would annoy you the most? In my opinion, humble or not, it would be finding out that your team had been cheated out of something because of bribery, to match officials or maybe even one of your own players.
Imagine your team is playing the final match of the season, needs a win to stay up and your centre half gives away a very clumsy penalty in the last minute to give the opposition an undeserved 1-1 draw. Or maybe the team are playing a European match, win the home leg 2-0 and then lose the away leg 3-0 with some very strange refereeing decisions? How would you feel if you subsequently found out that the culprit had been bribed?
However, it seems that UEFA disagree with this assessment. To them bribery is just worthy of a small slap on the wrist, they obviously think it’s all part of the game. In 1997, thirteen years after it was finally proven that Nottingham Forest had been cheated out of a UEFA Cup final place in 1984 because Anderlecht had bribed the match official with a paltry few thousand pounds, UEFA initially said that they could do nothing because the offence happened more than ten years previously! They finally succumbed and banned Anderlecht the next time they qualified for a European competition.
Was that really a sufficient warning to other clubs not to go down that road? Anderlecht’s players and officials had the wonderful experience of a Euro Final and all they got was a one year ban. Do you think that was fair punishment? I think the club should have been banned from Europe for ten years at least. What were UEFA trying to say exactly with their actions? Nothing initially because the offence had happened ten years earlier – so basically that statement meant, cheat and get away with it for long enough and we won’t do anything!
In Italy it seems that bribery is a regular part of football. During the 2004-5 football season it was proven that at least four of Italy’s major clubs, Lazio, Milan, Juventus and Fiorentina, had been involved with bribing match officials. Of the four only Juventus were demoted from Serie A, the other three clubs just had points deducted the following season! Milan, who were initially ejected from the Champions League for season 2006/7 were reinstated and actually went on to win the competition beating Liverpool in the final!
In 2011, further investigations into this affair resulted in Inter also being accused of ‘Sporting fraud’ during the same season but nothing could be proven because ‘all facts were covered by a statute of limitation’! Do you think that a ‘statute of limitation’ is justified in this case? Wouldn’t it be far better if clubs knew that no time limits exist regarding punishment for bribery and corruption?
In fact these punishments were so severe that in 2011 several more Italian clubs were found to be involved in a completely different bribery case! Obviously the punishments did not fit the crime and the rewards for bribing players or match officials in order to gain an advantage far outweigh any points deduction or fine meted out later.
More recently we have had the case where a Spanish Judge has ordered the destruction of blood samples of many Spanish sportsmen including cyclists and apparently even footballers and Tennis players who may have been caught up in a drugs scandal. Judge Julia Patricia Santamaria ruled in Spanish court that the bags of blood, plasma and red blood cells, as well as accompanying evidence, gathered in a 2006 raid of the office of Dr. Eufemiano Fuentes could not be released to anti-doping authorities because of Spain’s privacy laws. ‘Privacy laws? Who is Judge Julia kidding?
Having heard a lot about this case in April and May of this year it all seems to have dropped off the radar since then. Even Dick Pound, the former chief of the World Anti-Doping Agency who was in charge of the agency when the Fuentes investigation began seven years ago, said the judge’s decision to keep the evidence from anti-doping authorities “seriously undermines the credibility of sport.” He added that Spain risks becoming a haven for dopers unless it takes a harder line regarding athletes who use drugs to cheat.
“This performance with the Fuentes case is typical of what we’ve seen with Spain,” he said. “For years, we’ve asked them for the evidence, but there was no cooperation at all from them. The courts were almost vigorous in making sure that none of the information saw the light of day.”
So it’s official then; bribery, corruption, drugs, it’s all an accepted part of sport and everyone is doing everything they can to sweep it under the carpet.
One last thought; Usain Bolt is a fabulous athlete and I would never think for one moment that he was using anything other than his immense talent to win his titles. BUT, if the authorities found out that he had been using drugs do you think they would announce it to the world? Do you think they would risk besmirching The Olympics, The recent World Athletics Championships and Athletics in general by informing Joe Public that their star performer was not actually legitimate?
If Roger Federer, at the height of his powers, had been found to be a drugs user, would we have been told about it? Or would he have quietly been ordered to cleanse himself and continue normally? I don’t think for a minute that Federer was a drugs user and this is not about Bolt or Federer – it’s about the ruling bodies of our sport who decide exactly what we should or should not know.
It’s really about time that sport was cleaned up and we should start at the very top.